Jump to navigation

You are currently browsing the daily archives for 12 May 2008

Gushing Happens

  • Posted on May 12, 2008

It’s said that people with Aspergers lack gauging mechanisms to read non-verbal messages neurotypicals send out, but then so do NTs! Yes, I am saying NTs can’t tell when someone is beginning to get turned off by their rambling. Oh NTs don’t call it “rambling.” They call it polite social chatter — “small talk” to be exact. However, the fact remains that I can see that others are clueless to notice how boring I find small talk to be. What difference is it what you call chattering (gushing endlessly about a boring topic versus small talk about obvious crap like the weather)? The best way to illustrate this might be to mix the popular music young teens enjoy with the music that maybe some elderly people enjoy relaxing to (like those who enjoy the opera) at the same time, place, and volume level. What is one man’s music is another man’s noise pollution.

But . . . here’s the problem: There seems to be something wrong with the scenario of NTs being able to trigger an Aspie to feel ‘handicapped’ because of an incorrect read of a social situation.

When I recently heard about a story of a couple of young girls glancing at one another to “go” because an Aspie’s faux pas of gushing out unsolicited knowledge, my first impression was that it is the two young girls who are the ‘handicapped’ ones.¹

Why would I say such a thing? I say it because they had an opportunity to tap into a great mind with a wealth of information that could have enriched their young lives, but instead they became ‘handicapped’ because of their inability to get over the social standards that spoiled them. How did it spoil them? It caused the two young girls to misread their situation and misjudge the brilliant man before them. It was as if these girls lack an ability to read a great book that has opened wide to reveal its pages for them. Granted, the information may have gushed out like a water facet which had its handle ‘bumped’ open and caused a sudden flow . . . but come on! How hard can it be to find the handle and monitor the flow?

Yes, there are some Aspies who have handles for their mouth expressing their knowledge that seem to be broken, but how do you know how ‘broken’ it is if the way you handle such uncomfortable situations is by foolishly disengaging and walking away rather than co-steering the conversation by speaking up with what’s on your mind? Aspies who are willing to readjust their verbal flow with the help of kind and gentle guidance are NOT the ‘rude’ people. Rude people don’t care enough about others to help them. Instead they walk away because it’s the easier thing to do and society backs them up by brainwashing people into believing that giving no explanation as to why they’re walking away is something they have no need to feel ashamed about. That principle is NO different than when a person might walk into and out of a room of people he knows without saying “hello” or “goodbye” to any of them. To most Aspies, such things seem unimportant . . . but yet they usually do it anyhow because it’s what is expected of them. Fine, but what about Aspies who hope for some respect and warmth from the people they meet? That’s less important? I doubt it. It seems to be socially acceptable to humiliate an Aspie by remaining silent and walking away instead of using the social situation for the benefit of everyone involved.

Those young girls in this example do have a handle, but they’re too judgmental to use it. The trash in this situation has nothing to do with a ‘gush’ gauge. The real big bag of trash that cannot be eliminated in this world is people judging others by their unsound humanistically arrogant principles. So what someone gushes! Big deal! People need to get over their standards that spoil them so they can realize how simple the solutions are. It’s easy for someone to say in a kind manner that they’re uncomfortable with someone’s gushing and work out a balanced solution that’s fair for everyone involved, no?

¹Usually adult Aspies have learned how to manage engaging into a conversation, but once ‘in there,’ staying balanced gets more difficult the longer an Aspie has to peddle his words.

I’ve Been Advised…

  • Posted on May 12, 2008

My husband suggested I have two different blogs rather than just this one. Poor guy. I know he means well, but apparently there still are things he cannot understand. I comprehend his logic, but honestly cannot see how to incorporate the purpose of two blogs. Why two blogs? Actually he would have suggested three, if he remembered that I also write about my Christian faith and many people today are offended by that too.

I was told my writing will not be taken seriously because I inject my moods into most of my posts. The solution supposedly is for me to have one blog presenting a respectable ‘professional’ image and another blog for things that would otherwise be kept ‘bottled up’ with the lid on tight, especially for my emotions. For example, I’m well aware that my sense of humor is unlike the norm. I wouldn’t be surprised if nobody shares my sense of humor (generally speaking). In fact, how can anyone share emotions with others if the necessary common denominators¹ simply don’t exist?

Asperger Syndrome people are human and most Aspies are not mentally ill. Many people misjudge others whom they cannot understand. I know because I’m always being misjudged. It’s normal for me and that’s why I’m sure my blog is probably misjudged too. Creating another blog isn’t going to help with that problem. Maybe two or more blogs would be beneficial to most people with multiple agendas, but for me to blog in a Dissociative Identity Disorderly manner (previously known as multiple personality disorder) is not going to be beneficial for either my readers or myself.

I know people behave differently at their job and can change their persona when off work as easily as one can change his shoes. It would make sense then that these same people would have no problem with maintaining different types of blogs either. This is why it seems like a good idea to remind people that Aspies like me don’t function the same way they do. Maybe I can separate posts somewhat and make a lame attempt at categorizing them, but to actually place them into a different blog? That would be like me forcing everyone to behave (and dress) the same way wherever they are and whoever they’re with — everyone would have to be consistent with the image they present.

This is why Aspies are derogatorily complained about for insisting on making their own rules for what they do. Neurotypical people NEED instruction manuals for knowing how to have functional relationships with Aspies just as much as Aspies NEED instruction manuals for co-existing with them. However, imagine being forced to live in a foreign country that will not tolerate, let alone want to understand why, your ways don’t match theirs. Or how about a wild animal captured and taken away from its natural habitat and being locked into a zoo created by creatures who have no clue how this wild animal thinks and/or feels?

¹By common denominators, I don’t mean people with Aspergers lack such things as empathy and/or humor. All human beings have the ability to experience the same basic functions. The difference though with neurotypical people is that they use their humanness not only in ways different from neuro-A-typicals, but also they do so for peculiar reasons. An example of a common denominator would be two Italians visiting in America for the first time — those Italians are human beings just like Americans are, but they don’t share the same background experiences of Americans and these Italians also carry slightly different genetic components than most Americans (like different dog breeds do, especially when comparing purebreds against mixed breeds).

Top


Creative Commons License
© 2008 - 2010 Sheila Schoonmaker