Jump to navigation

You are currently browsing the monthly archives for December 2008

The saddest words…

  • Posted on December 26, 2008

The saddest words I’ve ever read written by an author in her novel are:

As much as it hurt, she finally understood. The truth did not matter. It never had, never did, never would.

I should probably point out that what is said above is not relating to anything specific. It is about truth in general. That explains why I hear people say, “Everybody lies.” I don’t doubt Aspies are capable of practicing deception¹ and idle² words, but I do doubt they enjoy it as much as neurotypicals seem to. Who dares to say Jesus and/or God are liars? Only fools could be capable of such insanity.

Here are common examples of idle words and deception:

“How are you?” [If asked without really wanting to know.]

“Let’s get together for a cup of coffee someday.” [Spoken to sound friendly rather than actually wanting to do it.] 

“Tell him I’m not here.” [Commonly said to someone calling on the phone asking to speak with a person who doesn't want to talk with the caller.]

lie: [noun] 1.) A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood. 2.) Something meant to deceive or give a wrong impression.

Truth is a comprehensive term that in all of its nuances implies accuracy and honesty. Accuracy and honesty does not matter and never will sincerely matter to people, but to God… it matters more than anyone can imagine.

¹“But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.” — Revelation 21:8

²“But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.” — Matthew 12:36

Merry Christmas in 2008!

  • Posted on December 25, 2008

Without Christ, there is no hope for salvation.

No gift is greater than God’s love with eternal life. He sent His son to free us from our lust for sin.

“There is none righteous, no, not one.” — Romans 3:10

When you don't have reindeer…

  • Posted on December 24, 2008

You make do with whitetails for hitching up to the sleigh on Christmas Eve!

Hey girls, here comes redneck Santa… so make him work for his ride!

You don’t want to end up hanging around . . . do ya? Speaking of going up, up, and away,
. . . how do you know who might come tonight?

‘TWAS THE NIGHT JESUS CAME

‘Twas the night Jesus came and all through the house
Not a person was praying, not one in the house.
The Bibles were left on the shelf without care,
For no one thought that Jesus would come there.

The children were dressing to crawl into bed,
Not once ever kneeling or bowing a head.
And hubby in his chair with a beer on his lap
Was watching the Late Show while I took a nap.

When out of the east there rose such a clatter,
I sprang to my feet to see what was the matter.
Away to the window I flew like a flash
Tore open the shutters and lifted the sash!

When what to my wondering eyes should appear
But angels proclaiming that Jesus was here!
The light of His face made me cover my head-
It was Jesus returning, just as He said.

And though I possessed worldly wisdom and wealth,
I cried when I saw Him in spite of myself.
In the Book of Life which He held in His hand
Was written the name of every saved man.

He spoke not a word as He searched for my name;
When He said, “It’s not here” my head hung in shame.
The people whose names had been written with love
He gathered to take to His Father above.

With those who were ready He rose without a sound
While all the rest were left standing around.
I fell to my knees, but it was too late;
I had waited too long and thus sealed my fate.

I stood and cried as they rose out of sight;
Oh, if only I’d known that this was the night.
In the words of this poem the meaning is clear;
The coming of Jesus is now drawing near.

There’s only one life and when comes the last call
We’ll find that the Bible was true after all.

Holiday Gatherings

  • Posted on December 23, 2008

Just because most people celebrate holidays with fancy dinners and dress up for those occasions does not mean that they are not abiding by the same principle behind people who reveal too much of themselves inevitably want something back. The key words are too much. When things like big dinners at celebrations develop into traditions, people can easily lose track of why they do what they do. It starts of by wanting to share good times with loved ones. That desire doesn’t necessarily fade, but what can be unapparent to those who feel the need to work their tail off during the holidays are the other reasons why they behave like they do.

Unless these women (women know that it’s usually the women who do this) want to know why else they risk traveling into stressful territory when they’re creating a significant social gathering, they will do everything in their power to deny themselves from seeing an ulterior motive. They shouldn’t be ashamed about it, especially since it’s something all human beings strive after [love and acceptance].¹ What they should be ashamed about is not wanting to take an honest look at why they do what they do.

Many claim that they only want the company of family and friends on holidays and nothing more. It’s understandable to want guests to bring things like a bottle of wine or a desert to share if the host does not want to be overburdened with tasks. The clue that reveals ulterior motives is when the host always makes sure she has way more than enough of everything without what others may bring. It’s only logical that if you don’t want to be overburdened, then you don’t push yourself when you don’t have to. If someone is choosing to do more than what is necessary to have her guests feel welcome, then you can suspect that something is inevitably wanted back.

Extravagant² affairs demand praise and attention. People who are drawn to repeatedly behaving in this manner are addicted to their body’s release of the feel good hormones like endorphins and dopamine they experience each time they receive praise and/or positive attention. I can see it in their face and hear it in their voice, but I doubt they’re able to be aware of how needy they are. If they were, they’d be humiliated. That explains why they love being around others who are needy in the same way they are; it’s easy to hide and deny it existence. It also explains why they feel insulted and irritated by the rare few who find such groveling for praise and attention pathetic.

It’s not wrong to give praise and/or attention per se. It becomes wrong when someone feels insulted if she doesn’t receive it when and/or how she thinks she should. Positive attention is a gift. A gift is no longer a gift if it is expected. A person can only feel offended when they believe something is owed to them. When you have  a social mixture of politically/socially correct gamers combined with non-gamers (e.g., very young children and loyal Aspergians are social non-gamers), things like holiday dinners will be challenging.

Sure, I enjoy good food just like people enjoy a reliable car or trouble-free computer. I’m about as interested in recipes and/or food as most women are in knowing about car engines or computer motherboards. Food fuels my body and keeps me going. If I didn’t need to eat, I wouldn’t. I could easily forget about food, but my stomach won’t let me. Most women would probably forget about cars if they could travel better without them. Many women will not even touch a computer, let alone talk about one. Almost everyone just wants things to work without wanting to know why or how.

I only want to eat when I’m hungry. I don’t care how impressive it is, so long as it is real food without chemicals in it. I was told I’m being insulting if I don’t eat even though I don’t have an appetite. If I cooked a dinner and a guest was not up to eating, I wouldn’t take that as an insult. I would be glad the guest came over to visit. He or she would not need to eat in order to avoid offending me. If I felt like I needed to impress someone by my cooking, then I would feel offended by a person choosing to not eat (or if they did, but never gave a compliment). If I felt like I needed to impress someone by my writing, then I would feel offended if they never chose to read my blog (or if they did, but never gave a compliment). What does offend me is a double-standard. It’s hypocritical for a woman to think a guest is being rude by not eating her food, but yet this same woman wouldn’t think there is anything socially incorrect about never bothering to display any interest whatsoever in what the guest (who is an unimpressive cook that strongly dislikes cooking) can offer her. Pride causes people to be greedy for praise [recognition/popularity] as well as being greedy for money.

How would technically challenged women who thrive on social dinners (especially when they know they’re good cooks that find pleasure in cooking) enjoy attending a computer party for friends and family to share their technological goodies with one another during the holidays rather than having their host cooking and baking? They wouldn’t even attend such a thing. Even if they did, they sure wouldn’t want to give any kind of praise and/or positive attention to a host who displays an impressive amount of computer knowledge.

Ho, ho, ho… am I being naughty or nice by being honest? My guess is that most people would perceive this post as being not nice. If that’s the case, that’s not my problem. ;)

¹Wanting love and acceptance drives most people to secretively desire fame and fortune, especially those who do not experience God’s love firsthand.

²What is considered extravagant is relative to the eye of the beholder.

It’s illogical to me.

  • Posted on December 22, 2008

In my last post, I wrote about why I don’t like pronouns. Now I shall give an example of what I’m trying to explain. On page 228 of Mary McGarry Morris’s  hardcover novel “A Dangerous Woman” [Viking publishers], there is a sentence using pronouns which confused me. I can understand who is being referred to by the pronouns her and she, IF I completely ignore the plot and focus solely upon the sentence structure (that’s a difficult thing for me to do when I’m reading).

In this story, I was already getting the impression that Julia doesn’t like ‘Mr. Mackey’ and that Mack was aware of her negative opinion of him. On top of that, by this point it is undeniably clear that Martha wanted to dance with Mack. She was in love with him and she thought he would want to dance with her since he taught her how to dance. The scenario during the occurrence of this illogical sentence describes a band playing at a surprise birthday party that both Mack and Martha already knew about beforehand.

The sentence I’m referring is in bold text:

Julia was sitting with Martha now. Mack had promised to dance one dance with her, and she was still waiting.

Since the subject of the previous sentence is Julia and Martha is in the prepositional phrase, I was told Julia must be the one who is being referred to by the pronouns her and she. Besides my already having a sense of what each character thinks about the others, the next sentence confirms it:

“He’s also manic,” Julia said, her sharp eyes trailing his [Mack's] continuing skit with Dawn, who doubled over in laughter.

The only reason I can think of as to why Julia would be illogically waiting to dance with Mack and why Mack illogically promised to dance with Julia, is because they are both neurotypicals at a party. If it wasn’t for my stumbling across Can Aspies Make Friends and Have Dates?, I wouldn’t have any explanation for Mack’s promise he made to dance with Julia or for why Julia would be waiting for that dance. Martha would wait a lot longer for a dance with Mack than Julia ever would; plus, it’s obvious Mack never taught Julia how to dance.¹

I think Aspies struggle with comprehending what’s written often times because of not understanding the illogical and thoughtless ways that NTs think and behave sometimes. If and when that’s the case, it’s only logical that pronouns will ‘trip up’ an Aspie’s perception of what’s going on.

Aspies easily ‘trip up’ perceptions NTs form about them, because of their different way of thinking. Proof of this is evidenced in how little NTs are able to understand how the Aspie mind works. When NTs think Aspies are all about self and should be shunned, it’s only because they are making distorted judgments since they’re unable and/or unwilling to place themselves into the mindset of an Aspie [they're lacking Theory of Mind].

The NTs who criticize Aspies and think Aspies need to be ‘fixed’ ['cured'], don’t want to examine their own way of thinking. They’d rather find fault with Aspies so they can continue with their bloated egos instead of doing some work at trying to understand those who don’t neurologically function like they do. Just because an Aspie might begin to comprehend the way a NT mind works doesn’t mean that he will (or even should; if he could) conform to it. If he doesn’t conform, it does not mean he is being selfish. If someone thinks that a non-conforming Aspie should be shunned, then he should ask himself if the reverse shouldn’t also hold true—does it then mean that non-conforming NTs should be shunned by Aspies?

We are supposed to be living at a time when people respect diversity. We don’t have to adopt what others believe, but we should allow others to live with their choices. To demand a person to forfeit being true to self is NOT an example of respecting diversity (demanding is an example of intolerance and arrogance). We all should have the same freedom to speak, think, believe, and live in a way that honors self as long as it does not trespass [intrude] upon someone else’s boundary. Disputes happen when relative [subjective/opinionated] values get mixed up with absolute [objective/factual] values. Accusations and attacks should be expected because unseen spiritual forces are constantly in action.

Only fools can’t see how the devil benefits from deceiving people into believing that there is no such thing as an absolute right or wrong. Maliciousness can flourish when truth can be bent so the twister is enabled to destroy.

¹Mack taught Martha how to dance before this party. It would make more sense if Mack promised Martha one dance and Martha was the one waiting rather than Julia.

Why I don’t like pronouns.

  • Posted on December 21, 2008

It’s known that Aspies tend to struggle with reading comprehension. I never used to give much thought as to why I enjoy non-fiction much more that fiction. Non-fiction writing contains less pronouns than fiction. (My son is laughing at me as I’m typing this. He is telling me that I am writing like Beaver Cleaver.¹ That is not helping me to concentrate on what I want to say!… we’re both laughing too hard.)

Non-fiction stories filled with pronouns are also challenging for me to comprehend. Because of recently paying attention to the reasons why I enjoy reading the few novels I don’t have to struggle with following, I’m noticing one thing particularly extraordinary about them. These authors have a gift for the way they use pronouns and how their characters are woven into the plot. I’m not always sure who is being referred to with every pronoun, but when the writing style makes the “he said; she said”s exceptionally clear, I can follow the story.

An example of pronoun usage where I’m easily challenged is when reading the King James Version of the Bible. It is not because of the Elizabethan English (with its use of thou, thee, thy, thine, ye, etc.); it’s because of how often pronouns are used, especially in the Old Testament. The more transitions there are between the characters, the harder it becomes for me to keep track of who is saying what. If I could tell authors how to write so that my comprehension of what I’m reading would be ideal, I would request inserting [in brackets] the names of who or what is being referred to with every pronoun.

Because my mind is less fluid with transitions created by others (rapid shifts of thought require multi-tasking and executive functioning skills), pronouns quickly become annoying. Aspies are not the only ones who may be irritated by them. Deaf people don’t like them either. American Sign language avoids the use of pronouns (Signed English does not).

Verbal instructions involving multiple steps (like directions to get somewhere) are not much different from what pronouns demand cognitively. Aspies (like me) prefer to think deeply; like rocks that sink when thrown. Neurotypicals tend to be more like flat pebbles which can skim the surface of water and bounce from one spot on towards another before coming to rest. Rocks are heavy; just like verbiage. ‘Flat pebbles’ [NTs] enjoy pronouns, because they help to keep sentences flowing without being bogged down.

Verbosity is relative to need. Neurotypicals find it easy to track back a pronoun to its source noun because that ‘fits’ with their natural rhythm. Aspies don’t think the same way. If you make an Aspie read sentences with multiple objects and often repeated pronouns, then it becomes easy to mix up the objects that are being referred to (especially when huge amounts of self-generated thoughts tend to immediately arise in response to what’s being read). If Aspies were the majority and most books were written by and for them, then NTs could be perceived (by Aspies) as having poor reading comprehension. Neurotypicals would struggle with keeping track of following the train of thought because of how much more there would be to think about and how rapidly complicated it would get to comprehend everything packed into a sentance.

Pronouns are meant to improve comprehension, not to detract from it. When pronouns derail comprehension, it is not because of a reading disability. It is because the writer is not speaking the same language as his reader [and runs his life on a different neurological operating system (developed from a NT culture). When a writer does not think the same way is his reader, then how can he expect to be comprehended as well by him as the rest of the world?]²

¹When I write short sentences, it is because I’m trying to please the majority of readers. If I was writing only for myself, my sentences would look like a long train of words where you wouldn’t be able to see the caboose until long after the engine has passed.

[Edit added on 12-22-8] I posted an example of what I’m talking about in It’s illogical to me.

²[Edit added on 12-23-8]

Liberation from Christianity!

  • Posted on December 20, 2008

Happy Holidays! Let’s eliminate Christmas from public view!¹

Liberals unite to liberate by creating a more powerful government [kingdom]; one with more [humanistic] laws to futilely try enforcing…

“Give us a king like all the other nations have,” they pleaded.

Samuel was terribly upset and went to the Lord for advice.

“Do as they say, the Lord replied, “for I am the one they are rejecting, not you—they don’t want me to be their king any longer. Ever since I brought them from Egypt they have continually forsaken me and followed other gods. And now they are giving you the same treatment. Do as they ask, but warn them about what it will be like to have a king!”

So Samuel told the people what the Lord had said:

“If you insist on having a king, he will conscript your sons and make them run before his chariots; some will be made to lead his troops into battle, while others will be slave laborers; they will be forced to plow without pay; and make his weapons and chariot equipment. He will take your daughters from you and force them to cook and bake and make perfumes for him. He will take away the best of your fields and vineyards and olive groves and give them to his friends. He will take a tenth of your harvest and distribute it to his favorites.

He will demand your slaves and the finest of your youth and will use your animals for his personal gain. He will demand a tenth of your flocks, and you shall be his slaves.

You will shed bitter tears because of this king you are demanding, but the Lord will not help you.”

“But the people refused to listen to Samuel’s warning.

“Even so, we still want a king,” they said, “for we want to be like the nations around us. He will govern us and lead us to battle.”

So Samuel told the Lord what the people had said, and the Lord replied again, “Then do as they say and give them a king.”

—   1 Samuel 8:7-21 [LB]

…all hail to television, newspapers, and all other [biased] media! Make merry over our newly evolved holiday season, for unto us a new savior has been born and he will right the wrongs! “Joy to the world, the [new] lord is come! Let earth receive her king!” Like the new [sounding] ring? If it fits, wear it. :lol:

What’s next?

When people are saying, “All is well, everything is quiet and peaceful” — then, all of a sudden, disaster will fall upon them as suddenly as a woman’s birth pains begin when her child is born. And these people will not be able to get away anywhere—there will be no place to hide.

—   1 Thessalonians 5:3 [LB]

Why?

“All that glisters is not gold.”² —   Shakespeare [Merchant Of Venice]

(Note: Did I mention that I have a misconstrued sense of humor and an odd way of making merry? No, I’m not rejoicing over the event of no place to hide when the end comes. I’m rejoicing over the fact that Christians are still here on earth to sound the trumpet and that there is still time for nations to hear the Gospel message and respond. To those who think they shall be in glee when they no longer hear from people like me, you will remember the trumpets that have sounded when liberation from Christianity finally arrives.)

¹Not!

²The phrase simply means that just because something may look valuable, desirable or attractive, it does NOT mean that it definitely will be worth having once you discover its true nature. So basically, don’t rely on the superficial.

Donations Needed

  • Posted on December 19, 2008

News flash…

Research by the Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical reveals that an age-old epidemic is still without any hope for a cure. Due to the neglect of pushing for donations to fund this industry, its lack of awareness may become permanent.

The good news is it’s not too late! Let’s start the New Year off right by making January National Neurotypicalism Awareness Month and January 2nd World Neurotypicalism Awareness Day.¹ Together, we can make a difference!

…because sometimes you have to fight fire with fire!

¹If Neurotypicalism is too much, then NTism byte combine the bits better to represent those particular special characters?²

²‘D’techie humor :lol:

(Note: Don’t take this post literally. It’s just another parody by another aspie joining another aspie in another aspie quandary.)

Interest Versus Need

  • Posted on December 18, 2008

Yesterday I wrote, “…because society needs a better education about Aspergers, this blog is here for now. Something like the truth about Aspergers isn’t about what or who is popular. It’s about the possibility of making one person’s life better because one other person has suffered and learned the hard way.” I neglected to say my statement is relative. Society is interested in learning about Aspergers, so naturally people will also be interested in reading about the experiences Aspies have. I’m not going to say there is something wrong with writing about them. I will say however, if that is what I make my blog about, then writing about my experiences will stifle who I am and it will avoid what is needed.

I am a ‘vine’ abiding in Christ; not a conformist to the standards this world creates. One doesn’t need to be spiritually blind to see that people conform to this world, but one does need a new nature to understand what is said in Romans 12:2, “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.” This is why conformists are controlled by their thoughts. Those who submit to the will of God have self controlled thoughts, because “…God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.” [2 Timothy 1:7]

In other words, without the faith of Christ, one operates under the influence of his unbridled thoughts. Genuine Christians operate under the influence of God’s Holy Spirit so that God’s word [unwavering truth] works through them. There is no room for pride when, “… it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.” [Philippians 2:13] When God takes control of the reins to one’s heart, one’s self is no longer at the mercy of his thoughts. A renovated nature contains the power to transform; to influence¹ rather than be influenced by mankind. [Jeremiah 15:19]

Most (if not all) will probably disagree with what I’m about to say. Compared to mankind’s need for salvation from his totally depraved nature, education isn’t something people need. Learning about interesting things does not rescue society. Knowledge acts as a band-aid to cover up the world’s putrid infection underneath. Education has become idolized. Many people desperately place their hope in the government for salvation. Some simply give up hope and just try to do whatever they can to not think about what’s wrong.

No one can know what his ultimate need is if speaking about Jesus Christ is silenced. Preaching the Gospel² will not save the world. God never said He was going to save the world. In fact, He makes it clear that this world is doomed. It’s doomed because “…the natural³ man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”  [1 Corinthians 2:14]

Aspies are not the ‘norm’ in society. However, the percentage of Aspies in the world is far greater than the percentage of people who are not ‘natural.’ Even though there are more neuro-A-typicals than those elected of God for salvation, that doesn’t excuse my (or any Christian’s) primary duty of being a watchman to blow (or in my case, ‘blog’) the trumpet of warning. Silence means eternal death to the watchman, but if the watchman speaks, then this death falls upon the one who doesn’t take the warning.

¹The influence will vary depending upon the recipient. Only God knows who He has predestined to save, which is why He expects the sowers of His word to spread the Gospel in all the world. After the nations (which God ordains to) receive their witness, the end will come.

²Don’t quickly judge by the preaching you hear, because we are near the end of time and God warned us in Matthew 24:24 that the world would be full of false Christs and false prophets (teachings). 

³Natural as defined by Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible:

[[ SGreek - 5591. psuchikos ]]

{yucikoV} psuchikos psoo-khee-kos’

from 5590; sensitive, i.e. animate (in distinction on the one hand from 4152, which is the higher or renovated nature; and on the other from 5446, which is the lower or bestial nature):–natural, sensual.

What a profound piece!

  • Posted on December 17, 2008

While the neurotypical world tries to put together pieces for creating a picture of the Asperger mind, I’ve been busy assembling my pieces to understand the neurotypical mind. Within that puzzle, is another dimension → those born with a new nature matching Christ’s versus those left to be ruled by human nature.

The revelation that hit me today seems beyond my being able to describe it. Maybe that’s actually the ideal condition to be in for writing about it?  I can’t think of any emotion I’m not feeling. There is shock, grief, anger, joy, humor, and probably others which haven’t hit me yet (unless I’ve covered them all?).

For almost a year now, I wondered why people who know me in person do not want me knowing they read my blog. I see other blogs where writers don’t encounter this same experience. That blogger’s friends and family have no problem acknowledging that they view his blog. I’ve gotten to see that in my case, people would rather drop dead before talking about what I have online. After today, that mystery no longer exists, praise God!

This new insight, which will permanently change the way I am socially, began while re-reading the book, “A Dangerous Woman,” by Mary McGarry Morris.¹ On page 132 (the hardcover version), I came across the words, “People who revealed too much of themselves inevitably wanted something back. She smiled at the sudden image of a little boy with his underpants circling his ankles as he waited for her to pull hers down too.” (Maybe to fully understand these quoted words in context, you’ll have to read the book.) Almost immediately after I read that, I thought of my blog and wondered if and/or how many people think I want something from them because of how much I reveal of myself to others.

Here is what I learned by opening that can of worms (these are not my words; this is what was bravely told to me):

People who know me in person, already have a prejudice formed in their mind about me. Because of their pride (human nature), they want to find fault with me. They don’t like how much my life improves from my growing contentment over who I am becoming (they feel jealous). I’ve been known as being a very ‘needy’ person (they viewed me as being very lonely). People secretively want to devalue me so they can boost their own self-worth, but to my face they present a mask hoping for me to think otherwise. That explains the inconsistency between how they act in person versus in private, along with why my blog is a taboo subject to bring up. People who refuse to reveal their interest in reading my blog do so because they really don’t like me (that’s why it pains them to watch me enjoy anything). That also explains why they laugh at me when things happen which upset me.²

I used to reveal too much of myself because of an intense desire to create a friendship as quickly as possible. What I wanted is the same thing everyone wants→  acceptance, companionship, and some positive attention sometimes.

After I reached the point of knowing that the more I wanted a friend, the less likely it was going to happen, I knew I had to give it up. If a friendship was to ever develop in my life, it wasn’t going to be because of me being a friend. The usual outcome my acts of kindness  got me was taken advantage of. I find that ironic. Human nature being as it is, makes it so that people who are in need (lonely) are not the ones who get (companionship). The less lonely a person is, the more likely others will develop a friendship with that person. The more popular someone appears, the more popular they become (what a stupid cycle fools pedal…geez!)

Pride is the only reason someone would stay away from a person who the community perceives as behaving in a humiliating fashion. I find that hypocritical!

Being an Aspie who has a new nature with affections that match God’s, will always motivate me to love all people (love is not the same thing as like). What makes the difference in the way I will now view the people wearing masks comes from finally understanding why God says what he does in Hebrews 11:36-40, especially verse 38, “(Of whom the world was not worthy) they wandered in deserts, and in mountains, and in dens and caves of the earth.”

Whoever might think I want something because I blog as I do, is grossly mistaken. I could easily pull the plug on my blog and delete the whole thing right now without it bothering me. I’m sure it wouldn’t bother them either, but because society should be better educated about Aspergers, this blog is here for now. Something like the truth about Aspergers isn’t about what or who is popular. It’s about the possibility of making one person’s life better because one other person has learned the hard way.

¹The main character in the story, Martha Horgan, portrays an excellent example of a non-Christian Aspie woman. Here are some other parts from her book which ’slapped’ me in the face:

On page 54, “Her foot tapped, impatiently, as if she were in a hurry, on her way somewhere, as if SHE had more important things to do.”

On page 126, “‘Then will you tell John I didn’t steal his money; that I’d like my job back?’ ‘Well, I’ll certainly mention it,’ Birdy said, her voice like her smile, suddenly too bright. She had seen Birdy do this to others. She was being placated. Being humored.’”

On page 262, “‘So what’re you saying?’ She shrugged. ‘There’s something about me people hate.’ ‘What?’ He looked at her. ‘Your three legs? Your four arms? Your two heads?’ ‘I don’t know what.’ He squinted, as if appraising her through a lens. ‘I’ll tell you what it is. But it’s not hate. They’re afraid. They’re afraid of what they don’t understand. What they don’t know how to deal with. It’s a power you possess, and people fear it.’ His voice rose excitedly. ‘You don’t even understand it, because, when you look at people, you SEE them. Something in your eyes goes right through people, and it’s unnerving, and so they react negatively.’”

²Usually they manage to ‘cover up’ their glee when looking at me, but not always. There are times they don’t have a chance to get their mask on fast enough when they’re caught off guard.

Top


Creative Commons License
© 2008 - 2010 Sheila Schoonmaker