Jump to navigation

You are currently browsing all posts tagged with 'eccentrics'

How Odd

  • Posted on February 6, 2010

Oswald Chambers states in his book The Moral Foundations of Life in the chapter Natural Growth in Supernatural Grace, “If you live much by yourself you become an oddity, you never see the quirks in yourself.”

Most people want to be unique, but don’t want to be perceived as odd. By definition, there are no degrees of uniqueness. Either someone is the only one of his kind or he is not. On one level, everyone is unique, but superficially most people are not.

Since most people have a social life, their quirks in behavior are not peculiar. They can’t be if they’re going to have a social life. Being sociable requires staying within the boundaries of what’s considered usual behavior and not scaring people by behaving and/or thinking in ways unexpected. Insecure people find comfort in predictability, so when a person comes along who is enigmatic (as in the sense not clear to understand), he acquires the label of being odd. Once that happens, anyone who associates himself with the odd individual risks becoming an outcast from his own kind.

There exists a poignant difference or incongruity between what is expected and what actually is in regard to being superficially unique. It’s hypocritical to diagnose superficially unique persons as a minority to be biased against. That’s being prejudiced and proud. These are the days the majority insist on tolerance of all individuals, but yet those making the most noise in that populace are unable to see their own quirks because of being enmeshed into their own agendas.

Liberally Hypocritical

  • Posted on February 13, 2008

There is this little food co-op I frequent but refuse to join. I must assume it’s controlled by nonnatives since their thinking and behavior does not reflect the locals of the area. These liberally-minded people call the locals rednecks, while these rednecks refer to them as citdiots, citiots, or simply a citiot.

Before I go further in what I’m about to say, I must inject that I speak with generalizations (prejudice is what the other side would call it). Not all rednecks are of high intelligence just like not all citdiots are on the lower end of the cognitive scale.

Anyhow, I figured that since they think it’s okay for themselves to be blatant about their New Age religious stance and their liberal democratic politics, so much so as to quickly eliminate any opposing publications that might find its way anywhere near the property of this authoritarian left-wing democrat co-op regime, then it’s okay for me to be blatant about my thoughts too.

I shall give some examples to display why I conclude what I do:

Years back, this food co-op relished the opportunity of possibly being able to regularly purchase a good source of high-quality organic produce from Amish farms. They especially loved the idea of having wholesale raw milk for retail sales. The closest thing to this milk possible for them to sell is pasteurized non-homogenized milk. The Amish had non-pasteurized non-homogenized milk, along with many other excellent goods. Their popping corn is far more nutritious than what can be found in almost any health food store these days. You could even see and smell the nutrition in the butter! They brought with them samples of many different cheeses, yogurt, breads, and eggs. Organic poultry, meats, and fish were being added to their expanding order form.

Anyhow, this particular Amish family went far out of their way to travel with their samples of potential goods to sell; plus, they put in a lot of effort for planning a way to bring their produce to this local area for the co-op’s market. Both the managers of the co-op and the Amish wanted this wonderful idea to work. A middle agent was required in order to make this business venture a reality. The Amish and the co-op had to depend on a reliable method of transport to get these goods from their farms to this market, especially since the produce was going from one state to another.

I wasn’t that transporting middle agent, but I was in the middle of hearing both sides to this failed project. When hearing what the Amish had to say about why they were unable to make this idea work, they spoke humbly with deep regrets over the disappointment of not being able to reach an agreement with the transport driver. Then when I listened to what the co-op manager involved with this had to say about what happened (or more like didn’t happen), she had an arrogant attitude of disgust towards the Amish because of not being able to get what she wanted.

I had already figured out that this co-op is run by a low-class clique before that Amish incident. After this episode mentioned above, I had requested my name to be placed on a waiting list for participating in their alternative plan for getting raw milk. Everyone who wanted this milk would take a turn at driving the distance needed to get enough milk for others in their group. When I had not heard from the woman in charge of organizing this after having waited patiently for a substantial period of time, I contacted her to ask what happened. She told me that she was sorry for having forgotten to include me on their list. That was already many years ago now. She still has not put me on their list. Humm . . . must be selective amnesia?

Here is another example of the type of people who usually join this co-op:

One day as I was shopping in this quaint little place, I heard a stranger trying to engage in friendly conversation with another shopper. I thought it odd that I’d only hear his voice. I couldn’t see at the moment who was talking since he wasn’t in my view. I observed what was going on for awhile. It’s true this guy was out of the ordinary in his approach with people, but clearly he wasn’t being rude. He spoke politely even though his voice may have been at a slightly higher volume than most others would talk.

Upon seeing that no one would associate with him, I decided to introduce myself to this interesting character. I must add that most of the people who shop in this co-op are odd characters. It’s obvious by how a lot of them dress. You’d think you have entered a place where everyone was in competition to be the most eccentric. Before I even got to the other side of the center isle where usually two cashiers are working (and that divided me from where this guy was now standing), I noticed the cashier nearby using a hand gesture to motion to the customer in front of me that this shunned guy was a kooky nut. Seeing her behave so arrogantly immature gave me the last bit of incentive I needed to get over my shyness.

As I was respectfully chatting away to get acquainted with this unappreciated fellow, I noticed everyone else around had stopped talking. They were all staring at me and this man. That’s odd . . . isn’t that socially incorrect behavior what those identical people would call rude if others did that to them?

Oh well, it’s all par for the course. They’re the ones who do such things as proudly sell Peace cereal to promote Yogi Bogi and support do-gooder activist movements, but yet they’re also the ones who make fun of and laugh at neighbors who don’t agree with their hypocritical agendas. These politically liberated folks are mostly migrants from the city who come to the country, buy up the land, raise the taxes and local prices, and then they tell the local natives how to live . . . all this to boot while saying, “Hey, no more building allowed around here because we live here now and we don’t want anymore changes now that things are the way we want them!” If that’s not bold enough, add to that their false advertising campaigns placed in their politically intellectual big-city newspapers back home about what the locals say so that these citdiots can reinforce their foothold they’ve gained in the area they’ve taken control over! . . . and they’re the very same ones who are against the principle of us going into another country and starting a war there!

They claim art, intelligence, and high-class didn’t exist until they brought it into the area. If only they could see how they really look, then maybe they wouldn’t act so foolish, immature, and trashy. That’s as likely to happen as it is for someone to turn back time.

If ignorance is bliss . . .

  • Posted on February 9, 2008

If ignorance is bliss, then that means (generally speaking) the lower a person’s IQ, the happier s/he is. Does this mean the higher someone’s IQ is (generally speaking), the greater the risk for being disliked? Could be. That would explain many things.

For example, it would explain why those in a lower range of intelligence are unable to recognize someone in a higher range. But the higher the range that one is in, the more it becomes evident how those with less awareness, have less awareness of what they’re missing. Like it’s said, “It takes one to know one.”

I find it quite interesting that most often the most brilliant people¹ in time have usually been the least popular while they were living. Inventions from great ideas might be celebrated and maybe even eventually its inventor, but while the truly gifted live? Generally speaking, not really (especially if they lived with meager resources, which they usually did because most likely money wasn’t where their mind was at). People respect money because that’s what most people love; and those who do that, they’re the ones who think people are to be used (i.e., 99.9% of those without a “paycheck job” like the rest of the society are looked down upon by those who are employed).

It’s a fact that people will not elect a leader who has an IQ range that’s 30 points above the average. The most powerful intellects are people that the average person has never heard about, nor ever will. But, from what I observe, most people don’t even care and/or want to think about such things.

Even as I type this, I know there will be plenty of readers disagreeing. I’m even sure I can’t explain myself to them. I don’t want to provoke debate. I want to spark more thought and awareness into the world, but maybe that’s an impossible dream of mine? There is such a thing as a negative prejudice against highly intelligent people, but those who exhibit it can’t admit it because . . . well, they’re just not equipped to do so. This is not an arrogant statement. It is an informative one.

¹Unfortunately people look to education as a measure of intelligence. That’s not really a reliable measure because of too many other factors involved. Being a walking encyclopedia is like a computer that’s loaded with mega amounts of data. You can “google” a person’s mind and maybe get impressed, but what good is that if someone’s mental operating system is poor at generating new data from within that hasn’t already been entered in from an external source?!

Top


Creative Commons License
© 2008 - 2010 Sheila Schoonmaker